aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ntfs/mft.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ntfs/mft.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/ntfs/mft.c58
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c
index 584260fd684..2ad5c8b104b 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ MFT_RECORD *map_extent_mft_record(ntfs_inode *base_ni, MFT_REF mref,
int i;
unsigned long mft_no = MREF(mref);
u16 seq_no = MSEQNO(mref);
- BOOL destroy_ni = FALSE;
+ bool destroy_ni = false;
ntfs_debug("Mapping extent mft record 0x%lx (base mft record 0x%lx).",
mft_no, base_ni->mft_no);
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ map_err_out:
if (seq_no && (le16_to_cpu(m->sequence_number) != seq_no)) {
ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Found stale extent mft "
"reference! Corrupt filesystem. Run chkdsk.");
- destroy_ni = TRUE;
+ destroy_ni = true;
m = ERR_PTR(-EIO);
goto unm_err_out;
}
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ map_err_out:
if (unlikely(!tmp)) {
ntfs_error(base_ni->vol->sb, "Failed to allocate "
"internal buffer.");
- destroy_ni = TRUE;
+ destroy_ni = true;
m = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
goto unm_err_out;
}
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ err_out:
* caller is responsible for unlocking the ntfs inode and unpinning the base
* vfs inode.
*
- * Return TRUE if the mft record may be written out and FALSE if not.
+ * Return 'true' if the mft record may be written out and 'false' if not.
*
* The caller has locked the page and cleared the uptodate flag on it which
* means that we can safely write out any dirty mft records that do not have
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ err_out:
* Here is a description of the tests we perform:
*
* If the inode is found in icache we know the mft record must be a base mft
- * record. If it is dirty, we do not write it and return FALSE as the vfs
+ * record. If it is dirty, we do not write it and return 'false' as the vfs
* inode write paths will result in the access times being updated which would
* cause the base mft record to be redirtied and written out again. (We know
* the access time update will modify the base mft record because Windows
@@ -877,11 +877,11 @@ err_out:
*
* If the inode is in icache and not dirty, we attempt to lock the mft record
* and if we find the lock was already taken, it is not safe to write the mft
- * record and we return FALSE.
+ * record and we return 'false'.
*
* If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the mft record,
* which also allows us safe writeout of the mft record. We then set
- * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return TRUE.
+ * @locked_ni to the locked ntfs inode and return 'true'.
*
* Note we cannot just lock the mft record and sleep while waiting for the lock
* because this would deadlock due to lock reversal (normally the mft record is
@@ -891,24 +891,24 @@ err_out:
* If the inode is not in icache we need to perform further checks.
*
* If the mft record is not a FILE record or it is a base mft record, we can
- * safely write it and return TRUE.
+ * safely write it and return 'true'.
*
* We now know the mft record is an extent mft record. We check if the inode
* corresponding to its base mft record is in icache and obtain a reference to
- * it if it is. If it is not, we can safely write it and return TRUE.
+ * it if it is. If it is not, we can safely write it and return 'true'.
*
* We now have the base inode for the extent mft record. We check if it has an
* ntfs inode for the extent mft record attached and if not it is safe to write
- * the extent mft record and we return TRUE.
+ * the extent mft record and we return 'true'.
*
* The ntfs inode for the extent mft record is attached to the base inode so we
* attempt to lock the extent mft record and if we find the lock was already
- * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return FALSE.
+ * taken, it is not safe to write the extent mft record and we return 'false'.
*
* If we manage to obtain the lock we have exclusive access to the extent mft
* record, which also allows us safe writeout of the extent mft record. We
* set the ntfs inode of the extent mft record clean and then set @locked_ni to
- * the now locked ntfs inode and return TRUE.
+ * the now locked ntfs inode and return 'true'.
*
* Note, the reason for actually writing dirty mft records here and not just
* relying on the vfs inode dirty code paths is that we can have mft records
@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ err_out:
* appear if the mft record is reused for a new inode before it got written
* out.
*/
-BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
+bool ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
const MFT_RECORD *m, ntfs_inode **locked_ni)
{
struct super_block *sb = vol->sb;
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
mft_no);
atomic_dec(&ni->count);
iput(vi);
- return FALSE;
+ return false;
}
ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not dirty.", mft_no);
/* The inode is not dirty, try to take the mft record lock. */
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
"not write it.", mft_no);
atomic_dec(&ni->count);
iput(vi);
- return FALSE;
+ return false;
}
ntfs_debug("Managed to lock mft record 0x%lx, write it.",
mft_no);
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
* return the locked ntfs inode.
*/
*locked_ni = ni;
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
ntfs_debug("Inode 0x%lx is not in icache.", mft_no);
/* The inode is not in icache. */
@@ -1003,13 +1003,13 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
if (!ntfs_is_mft_record(m->magic)) {
ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is not a FILE record, write it.",
mft_no);
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
/* Write the mft record if it is a base inode. */
if (!m->base_mft_record) {
ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is a base record, write it.",
mft_no);
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
/*
* This is an extent mft record. Check if the inode corresponding to
@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
*/
ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is not in icache, write the "
"extent record.", na.mft_no);
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is in icache.", na.mft_no);
/*
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
iput(vi);
ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx has no attached extent inodes, "
"write the extent record.", na.mft_no);
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
/* Iterate over the attached extent inodes. */
extent_nis = ni->ext.extent_ntfs_inos;
@@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is not attached to its base "
"inode 0x%lx, write the extent record.",
mft_no, na.mft_no);
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
ntfs_debug("Extent inode 0x%lx is attached to its base inode 0x%lx.",
mft_no, na.mft_no);
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
iput(vi);
ntfs_debug("Extent mft record 0x%lx is already locked, do "
"not write it.", mft_no);
- return FALSE;
+ return false;
}
ntfs_debug("Managed to lock extent mft record 0x%lx, write it.",
mft_no);
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
* the locked extent ntfs inode.
*/
*locked_ni = eni;
- return TRUE;
+ return true;
}
static const char *es = " Leaving inconsistent metadata. Unmount and run "
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_bitmap_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
ntfs_unmap_page(page);
/* Allocate a cluster from the DATA_ZONE. */
rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, rl[1].vcn, 1, lcn, DATA_ZONE,
- TRUE);
+ true);
if (IS_ERR(rl2)) {
up_write(&mftbmp_ni->runlist.lock);
ntfs_error(vol->sb, "Failed to allocate a cluster for "
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
ATTR_RECORD *a = NULL;
int ret, mp_size;
u32 old_alen = 0;
- BOOL mp_rebuilt = FALSE;
+ bool mp_rebuilt = false;
ntfs_debug("Extending mft data allocation.");
mft_ni = NTFS_I(vol->mft_ino);
@@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
old_last_vcn = rl[1].vcn;
do {
rl2 = ntfs_cluster_alloc(vol, old_last_vcn, nr, lcn, MFT_ZONE,
- TRUE);
+ true);
if (likely(!IS_ERR(rl2)))
break;
if (PTR_ERR(rl2) != -ENOSPC || nr == min_nr) {
@@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ static int ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(ntfs_volume *vol)
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto undo_alloc;
}
- mp_rebuilt = TRUE;
+ mp_rebuilt = true;
/* Generate the mapping pairs array directly into the attr record. */
ret = ntfs_mapping_pairs_build(vol, (u8*)a +
le16_to_cpu(a->data.non_resident.mapping_pairs_offset),
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ ntfs_inode *ntfs_mft_record_alloc(ntfs_volume *vol, const int mode,
unsigned int ofs;
int err;
le16 seq_no, usn;
- BOOL record_formatted = FALSE;
+ bool record_formatted = false;
if (base_ni) {
ntfs_debug("Entering (allocating an extent mft record for "
@@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ have_alloc_rec:
mft_ni->initialized_size = new_initialized_size;
}
write_unlock_irqrestore(&mft_ni->size_lock, flags);
- record_formatted = TRUE;
+ record_formatted = true;
/* Update the mft data attribute record to reflect the new sizes. */
m = map_mft_record(mft_ni);
if (IS_ERR(m)) {
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-05-02 23:10:41 +0000